Comparison of Turbulence Models Using Overset and Sliding Meshes in Fluent ANSYS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14018619Keywords:
Overset, Sliding mesh, NACA 4415, H-Darrieus, Turbulence Models, ANSYS FluentAbstract
This research presents a comparison of the performance of an H-Darrieus turbine with the NACA 4415 asymmetric airfoil in terms of different CFD configurations. Several turbulence models were used and evaluated using two mesh assembly methods: sliding mesh and overset using ANSYS Fluent®. The turbulence models used include the SST k-ω, k-εrealizable, and k-ε standard models. The results indicate that the overset mesh method reduces simulation time, and while the performance differences between the two methods are not substantial, the overset method offers improved control and quality in element distribution, ensuring more accurate flow predictions and mesh management.
References
Bahrami, S., Tribes, C., Von Fellenberg, S., Vu, T. C., & Guibault, F. (2014). Multi-fidelity design optimization of Francis turbine runner blades. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 22(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/22/1/012029
Duraisamy, K., & Lakshminarayan, V. (2014). Flow physics and performance of vertical axis wind turbine arrays. 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, June, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-3139
Farahani, A. S., Adam, N. M., & Ariffin, M. K. A. (2010). Simulation of Airflow and Aerodynamic Forces Acting on a Rotating Turbine Ventilator. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.3844/AJEASSP.2010.159.170
Gorle, J. M. R., Chatellier, L., Pons, F., & Ba, M. (2016). Flow and performance analysis of H-Darrieus hydroturbine in a confined flow: A computational and experimental study. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 66, 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.08.003
Mejia, O. D. L., Mejia, O. E., Escorcia, K. M., Suarez, F., & Laín, S. (2021). Comparison of Sliding and Overset Mesh Techniques in the Simulation of a Vertical Axis Turbine for Hydrokinetic Applications. Processes 2021, Vol. 9, Page 1933, 9(11), 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR9111933
Nabhani, A., Tousi, N. M., Coma, M., Bugeda, G., & Bergada, J. M. (2024). Large-Scale Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamic Efficiency Optimization using Active Flow Control and Synthetic Jets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20746v1
Robin, I., Mouazé, D., Bennis, A. C., & Carpentier, G. (2023). Evaluation of the overset method applied to an active lift turbine. Ocean Engineering, 289, 116160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2023.116160
Seel, F., Lutz, T., & Krämer, E. (2023). Numerical study of the unsteady blade root aerodynamics of a 2gMW wind turbine equipped with vortex generators. Wind Energy Science, 8(9), 1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.5194/WES-8-1369-2023
Wu, Y., Liu, S., Wu, X., Dou, H., Zhang, L., & Tao, X. (2010). Turbulent flow computation through a model Francis turbine and its performance prediction. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 12(1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/12/1/012004
Yadav, S., Veeravalli, S. V, & Singh, N. (2019). COMPARISON OF PREDICTED PERFORMANCE OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE USING OVERSET MESH AND SLIDING MESH. International Conference on Applied Energy.
Ye, M., Zhao, Y., Chen, H. C., & Wan, D. (2024). Quantification of numerical uncertainties of CFD-predicted wind turbine performance with overset grids. Ocean Engineering, 298, 117231. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2024.117231
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Angie Guevara M., Diego Hincapie. Z
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.