Authentication of Electronic Evidence Derived from Digital Transactions and Communications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17926441

Keywords:

Electronic evidence; Authentication; Blockchain; Digital data; Vietnam.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and blockchain has profoundly transformed how information is generated, exchanged, and utilised in commercial transactions. This evolution raises urgent legal and technical challenges regarding the authentication of electronic evidence, which is crucial to ensuring the integrity, reliability, and probative value of digital data in judicial and arbitral proceedings. This paper examines the theoretical foundations and practical challenges of authenticating electronic evidence derived from digital transactions and communications in Vietnam. Through comparative analysis of legal frameworks in Singapore, the United States, and the European Union, the study identifies Vietnam’s lack of integration between legal provisions and technical standards as the main obstacle to effective authentication. The research proposes a series of reforms, including establishing authentication mechanisms for specific digital transactions, creating a trusted third-party verification system, regulating the chain of custody, institutionalising a national digital forensic centre, and promoting capacity building through public–private partnerships. The findings highlight that improving Vietnam’s legal and technical framework for the authentication of electronic evidence is essential not only for procedural fairness and legal certainty but also for fostering a transparent and trustworthy digital economy.

References

Al-E‘mari, S., Sanjalawe, Y., Makhadmeh, S., & Alqudah, H. (2024). Digital Forensics Meets Blockchain: Enhancing the Authenticity and Traceability of Evidence. 2024 2nd International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCR61006.2024.10532961

Civil Procedure Code (2015).

European Union. (2014). REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.

Federal Rules of Evidence (2024).

Ferreira, D. B., & Gromova, E. A. (2023). Electronic evidence in arbitration proceedings. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v20i.5608

ISO. (2012). Information technology-Security techniques-Guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition, and preservation of digital evidence.

Law on Electronic Transactions, Pub. L. No. No. 20/2023/QH15, National Assembly (2023).

Mason, S., & Seng, D. (2017). Electronic Evidence.

Nguyen Thanh Minh Chanh. (2021). Pháp luật về chứng cứđiện tử trong tố tụng dân sự Việt Nam. http://lapphap.vn

Psychogiopoulou, E. (2021). Judicial dialogue in social media cases in europe: Exploring the role of peers in judicial adjudication. In German Law Journal (Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 915–935). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.57

Rahul, M., Bharati, K., Khodke, P. G., Khadilkar, C. P., & Bawiskar, S. K. (2024). Forensic Bytes: Admissibility and Challenges of Digital Evidence in Legal Proceedings. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology (Www.Ijsrst.Com) |, 11(16), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST

Seng, D. K. B. (2024). Electronic Evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4964150

Singapore Parliament. (1983). Evidence Act 1893 and 2020 revised edition.

Singapore Parliament. (2010). ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT 2010 2020 REVISED EDITION.

Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575

TAND huyện Bình Xuyên, tỉnh V. P. (2024). Tranh chấp hợp đồng vay tài sản [Property loan contract dispute].

Tran, Q. A. (2022). Electronic Evidence in Civil and Commercial Dispute Resolution (Vol. 27). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18572-4

Wang, X., Wu, Y. C., & Ma, Z. (2024). Blockchain in the courtroom: exploring its evidentiary significance and procedural implications in U.S. judicial processes. Frontiers in Blockchain, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2024.1306058

Wu, H., & Zheng, G. (2020). Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity. Computer Law and Security Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105401

Xiao, N., Wang, Z., Sun, X., & Miao, J. (2024). A novel blockchain-based digital forensics framework for preserving evidence and enabling investigation in industrial Internet of Things. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 86, 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.12.021

Downloads

Published

2025-11-09