Location Quotient Analysis in Determining Leading Livestock in Aceh Tamiang District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13912398Keywords:
Aceh Tamiang, Livestock, Location Quotient (LQ), Poultry, SuperiorityAbstract
The study aims to identify leading livestock commodities in Aceh Tamiang District using the Location Quotient (LQ) method with data from 2015-2023. Results indicate that the highest LQ values for different livestock types vary across sub-districts: Tenggulun for cattle (2.35), Sekerak for goats (3.07), Banda Mulia for sheep (3.09), Bandar Pusaka for kampong chickens (1.63), Rantau for broilers (1.99), Kuala Simpang for breeder chickens (2.46), and Karang Baru for ducks (2.46). These variations are influenced by natural resources, infrastructure, technology, and skilled labor. Collaboration between local government and industry is essential to boost production and regional income.
References
Adegoke, A. T., & Abioye, A. A. (2016). Improving livestock productivity : Assessment of feed resources and livestock management practices in Sudan-Savanna zones of West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.10460
Amole, T. A., Adekeye, A., & Ayantunde, A. A. (2021). Assessment of Livestock Water Productivity in Seno and Yatenga Provinces of Burkina Faso. Frontier in Sustainable Food System, 5(April), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.632624
Bai, Z., Ma, W., Ma, L., Velthof, G. L., Wei, Z., Havlík, P., Oenema, O., Lee, M. R. F., & Zhang, F. (2018). China’s livestock transition: Driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Science Advances, 4(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8534
BPS. (2023). Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang Dalam Angka. https://acehtamiangkab.bps.go.id/publication/download.html?nrbvfeve=M2NhNTk4NzJkMTEzNjUyODRhZWI4YmNm&xzmn=aHR0cHM6Ly9hY2VodGFtaWFuZ2thYi5icHMuZ28uaWQvcHVibGljYXRpb24vMjAyMy8wMi8yOC8zY2E1OTg3MmQxMTM2NTI4NGFlYjhiY2Yva2FidXBhdGVuLWFjZWgtdGFtaWFuZy1kYWxhbS1hb
FAO. (2014). Building a common vision for sustainable food and agriculture.
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WEP, & WHO. (2023). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023. Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. In The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b27c570-2f8b-4350-8d5a-8e82432e6db7/content
Fironika, M., Mastuti, R., Jamil, M., & Study Program, A. (2023). Location Quotient Analysis in Determining Cattle Base in Aceh, Indonesia. Agrisep, 22(2), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.22.2.363-376
Gomes, A., Sá, A., Maria, Y., Moreno, F., Augusto, B., & Carciofi, M. (2020). Trends in Food Science & Technology Plant proteins as high-quality nutritional source for human diet. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 97(December 2019), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.011
Handayani, S., & Safrida, S. (2023). Characteristics of cattle farm breeders in Aceh Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1183(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1183/1/012037
Henchion, M., Hayes, M., Mullen, A. M., Fenelon, M., & Tiwari, B. (2017). Future protein supply and demand: Strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods, 6(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6070053
Jiang, Y., Zhang, Q., Niu, J., & Wu, J. (2019). Pastoral Population Growth and Land Use Policy Has Significantly Impacted Livestock Structure in Inner Mongolia — A Case Study in the Xilinhot Region. Sustainability, 11(7208), 1–17.
Jiménez, M. I., Abbott, P., & Foster, K. (2018). MeasureMent and analysis of agricultural Productivity in coloMbia. American Journal of Applied Economics, 22(47), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.17230/ecos.2018.47.1
Julia Kardin, Masduqi, & Koesmara, H. (2023). Analysis of Potential Area of Ruminant Livestock Development Commodities in Aceh Province. Jurnal Agrisistem: Seri Sosek Dan Penyuluhan, 19(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.52625/j-agr-sosekpenyuluhan.v19i1.253
Khurshid, N., Ajab, S., Tabash, M. I., & Barbulescu, M. (2023). Asymmetries in climate change and livestock productivity: non-linear evidence from autoregressive distribution lag mode. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1139631
Kumar, S., Kumar, S., Joshi, D., Upadhyay, S. K., & Singh, D. (2020). Impact of rural infrastructure on performance of livestock sector in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(4), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104225
Mngumi, F., Sun, N., Huang, L., & Shaorong, S. (2022). A green finance strategy plan to integrate livestock sectors sustainability in Tanzania. Journal of Livestock Science, 13(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.33259/jlivestsci.2022.267-278
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017). Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 14(January 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
Nabarro, D., & Wannous, C. (2014). The potential contribution of livestock to food and nutrition security: The application of the One Health approach in livestock policy and practice. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 33(2), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.2.2292
Rahayu, E. T., Purnomo, S. H., Sari, A. I., Emawati, S., & Dewanti, R. (2024). Analysis of livestock resources potential for the dairy cattle farming development in Plaosan district , Magetan regency Analysis of livestock resources potential for the dairy cattle farming development in Plaosan district , Magetan regency. International Conference on Animal Research for Eco-Friendly Livestock Industry, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1292/1/012031
Samad, A. P. A., Navia, Z. I., & Junita, A. (2024). Diversity of potential and endemic freshwater fishes in Aceh Tamiang. BIO Web of Conferences, 87(03006), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248703006
Sarma, H., Khan, J. R., Asaduzzaman, M., Uddin, F., Tarannum, S., & Hasan, M. (2017). Factors Influencing the Prevalence of Stunting Among Children Aged Below Five Years in Bangladesh. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 38(3), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572117710103
Subach, T. I., & Shmeleva, Z. N. (2022). Introduction of digital innovations in livestock farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1112(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1112/1/012079
Sumaryanti, L., & Muchlis, D. (2024). Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems Analysis of Regional Potential in Merauke Regency Based on Superior Livestock Population Using a Hybrid Algorithm. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(3), 754–764.
Vlaicu, P. A., Gras, M. A., Untea, A. E., Lefter, N. A., & Rotar, M. C. (2024). Advancing Livestock Technology: Intelligent Systemization for Enhanced Productivity, Welfare, and Sustainability. AgriEngineering, 6(2), 1479–1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6020084
Waithaka, B. (2024). Policies and Mechanisms for Providing Insurance and Risk Management Tools to Livestock Farmers to Protect Them against Production Risks. Journal of Livestock Policy, 3(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.47604/jlp.v3i1.2518
Wu, G., Fanzo, J., Miller, D. D., Pingali, P., Post, M., Steiner, J. L., & Thalacker-Mercer, A. E. (2014). Production and supply of high-quality food protein for human consumption: Sustainability, challenges, and innovations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1321(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12500
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mastuti, Fuad, Marnita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.