Integrating Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and Disassembly to Accelerate Circular Economy in Construction: A Conceptual Framework

Authors

  • Thuy Binh Pham Hanoi University of Civil Engineering, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17538946

Keywords:

DFMA, DFD, Life Cycle, Sustainable Construction, Circular Economy, Vietnam.

Abstract

The construction industry continues to rely on linear “take–make–dispose” models that generate significant waste and resource inefficiency. This paper proposes a conceptual framework integrating Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) and Design for Disassembly (DFD) to accelerate the transition toward circular construction. Using a conceptual–illustrative approach, the study synthesises key insights from design theory and circular economy principles to explain how DFMA enhances production efficiency while DFD ensures material recoverability and reuse. The proposed framework connects design efficiency, material value retention, and policy readiness through enabling mechanisms such as modular standardisation and digital modelling. Findings indicate that integrating DFMA and DFD redefines efficiency from linear productivity to regenerative value creation, transforming buildings into dynamic material banks. The study concludes that design integration offers a strategic pathway for developing economies, such as Vietnam, to achieve industrialised, low-carbon, and circular construction systems.

References

Akbarieh, A., Jayasinghe, L. B., Waldmann, D., & Teferle, F. N. (2020). BIM-based end-of-lifecycle decision making and digital deconstruction: Literature review. Sustainability, 12(7), 2670.

Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Ajayi, S. O., Bilal, M., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., Bello, S. A., Jaiyeoba, B. E., & Kadiri, K. O. (2017). Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. Waste management, 60, 3-13.

Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. d. C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 260, 121046.

Bock, T. (2015). The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Automation in construction, 59, 113-121.

de Lima, P. R. B., de Souza Rodrigues, C., & Post, J. M. (2023). Integration of BIM and design for deconstruction to improve circular economy of buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108015.

Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birkved, M., & Birgisdottir, H. (2022). Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(2), 93-113.

Hart, J., Adams, K., Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., & Pomponi, F. (2019). Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment. Procedia Cirp, 80, 619-624.

Hossain, M. U., & Ng, S. T. (2018). Critical consideration of buildings' environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review. Journal of cleaner production, 205, 763-780.

Montazeri, S., Lei, Z., & Odo, N. (2024). Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA) in construction: A holistic review of current trends and future directions. Buildings, 14(1), 285.

Van Tuan, N., Kien, T. T., Huyen, D. T. T., Nga, T. T. V., Giang, N. H., Dung, N. T., Isobe, Y., Ishigaki, T., & Kawamoto, K. (2018). Current status of construction and demolition waste management in Vietnam: Challenges and opportunities. GEOMATE Journal, 15(52), 23-29.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05