Policy Pathways for Scaling Geopolymer Concrete: Lessons from Global Practices and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15779694Keywords:
geopolymer concrete, fly ash, low-carbon construction, policy frameworks, public procurement, waste-derived activators, sustainability transition.Abstract
This study explores policy pathways to accelerate the adoption of geopolymer concrete (GPC) as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement. Through comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in India and the EU, and life cycle assessment modeling, it identifies fiscal incentives, procurement reforms, and institutional support as key enablers. Despite technical advantages, GPC faces challenges such as carbonation risks and fly ash variability. Future research must address long-term durability, market readiness in developing countries, and global material databases. Findings emphasize that integrated policy frameworks are essential to scale GPC and unlock its potential for reducing construction sector emissions.
References
Aiman, M. S., Othman, I., Waqar, A., Hamah Sor, N., Isleem, H. F., Najm, H. M., Benjeddou, O., & Sabri, M. M. S. (2024). Geopolymers: Enhancing environmental safety and sustainability in construction. Civil Engineering Journal, 10(10), 3350–3369. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-10-015
Andrew, R. M. (2019). Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth System Science Data, 11(4), 1675–1710. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019
Astuti, P., Isnaini, M. S., Ammar, S. D., & Purnama, A. Y. (2024). Strength characteristic and life cycle cost of sustainable bio-patch repair geopolymer mortar using rice husk ash as an alternative silica and alumina source. BIO Web of Conferences, 144, Article 06003. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414406003
Davidovits, J. (2021). Geopolymer chemistry (5th ed.). Institut Géopolymère. https://www.geopolymer.org
Du, J., Yang, W., Yang, Q., Li, Y., Wan, X., Zhu, A., He, Z., Shrestha, R. P., & Razzaq, A. (2025). Assessment and seasonal monitoring of groundwater quality in landfill-affected regions of China: Findings from Xiangyang. Water, 17(4), Article 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040572
European Commission. (2022). GPP criteria for construction. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/eu_gpp_criteria_en.htm
Mathapati, M., Amate, K., Durga Prasad, C., Jayavardhana, M. L., & Hemanth Raju, T. (2022). A review on fly ash utilization. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 1535–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.106
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (2021). Notification on guidelines for fly ash utilization by coal- and lignite-based thermal power plants. https://cpcb.nic.in/uploads/fly-ash/FlyAshNotification_31122021.pdf
Putra, M. S. N., Prasojo, A. E., Budiman, A., Anty, M. Z., & Hasnowo, L. A. (2024). Comparative analysis of FABA waste composition in various coal-fired power plant industries in several countries and Indonesia: A review. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Studies, 3(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.55749/ijcs.v3i2.58
Zhao, C., Li, Z., Peng, S., Liu, J., Wu, Q., & Xu, X. (2024). State-of-the-art review of geopolymer concrete carbonation: From impact analysis to model establishment. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, Article e03124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03124
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raja Agung Hasudungan Simanjuntak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.