Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Speeches in Pakistan: Power, Ideology and Language Manipulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13772472Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Political Speeches, Power Structures, Ideological Framing, Fairclough's ModelAbstract
This study investigates the use of language in political speeches by prominent Pakistani politicians, focusing on how they influence and control public perception. Using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the research explores the role of language in shaping and reflecting power relations within society. The study applies Fairclough's three-dimensional model of CDA, which examines language through text analysis, discursive practice, and social practice. Text analysis looks at specific language choices, such as vocabulary and metaphors, to understand how these elements are used to persuade or influence audiences. Discursive practice examines the context in which speeches are prepared, delivered, and received, considering factors like the speaker's intentions and the audience's expectations. Social practice connects the language in speeches to the broader social and political environment, analyzing how these speeches reinforce or challenge existing power structures and ideologies. By analyzing how politicians discuss topics like nationalism, religion, democracy, and social issues, the study uncovers patterns that reflect and reinforce the power dynamics within Pakistani society. Ultimately, the research reveals that language in political speeches is not just a means of communication but a powerful tool for shaping public opinion and maintaining control over how ideas are perceived, reflecting deeper ideological currents in the national discourse.
References
Ali, S. Z., Umair, M., Munir, H., Anwar, B., Ikhtiar, A., un Nisa, Z., & Nawaz, M. H. (n.d.). A critical discourse analysis of PM Imran Khan interview with foreign broadcasters.
AliAkbar, S. F. (2024). Linguistic investigation of (de) legitimization strategies used in news topics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(9), 79-87.
Alkaabi, N. M. (2024). Socio-political aspects in framing narratives of conflict. University of Leicester.
Azizullah, M., & Fatemeh, S. (2017). Exploring rhetorical-discursive practices of Rouhani’s presidential campaign and victory of his prudence-and-hope key: A discourse of persuasion. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 161-182.
Bridging linguistic divides: Undergraduate experiences of code-switching in English language learning environments in Pakistan. (2023). Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(IV). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-IV)57
Bukhari, S. R. H., Khan, A. U., & Haq, I. U. (2024). Identity politics and regional dynamics: The OIC as a nexus of Muslim unity and diversity. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 208-215.
Kwekowe, U. P. (2024). Interrogating the place of context in discourse analysis: A critical discourse analysis of language use and power dynamics. EBSU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 14(4).
Nawaz, M. H., Munir, H., Din, D. U., Sultana, I., Ikhtiar, A., & Anwar, B. (2024). Analyzing Imran Khan’s post-premiership speeches: A critical discourse perspective. International Journal of Literature and Languages, 4(7), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume04Issue07-05
Nawaz, M. H., Nisa, Z., Hameed, S., & Qasim, H. (2024). Honor and subjection with reference to women representation in society with the use of language. SAUS Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15.
Naz, U., Mashwani, H. F., & Ali, S. (2024). Transformative impact of decentralization and federalism on democracy in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Academic Research, 5(1), 2.
Pham, T. Q. (2024). A synopsis of the three most influential approaches of critical discourse analysis. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(3), 172-181.
Ponet, B., De Clerck, A., Vantieghem, W., Tack, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2024). Uncovering the role of teacher educators in the reduction of inequalities in education: A critical discourse analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 27(3), 859-882.
Qin, L. (2024). Representing ‘native speakers’ on English language teaching (ELT) websites in China. Université d'Ottawa| University of Ottawa.
Samoškaitė, L. (2011). 21st century political euphemisms: Semantic and structural study. [Journal Name].
Shvelidze, L., Karavaieva, T., & Tomchakovska, Y. (2024). The influence of communicative strategies in social media discourse on the development of communication conflicts. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 368-378.
The sociolinguistic landscape of language representation in Pakistani television dramas: A critical discourse analysis. (2023). Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(IV). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-IV)43
Wodak, R., & Forchtner, B. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of language and politics. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Haseeb Nawaz, Anam Ikhtiar, Abbas Muhammad Raza, Muhammad Nouman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.