Exploring Value Co-creation Behavior in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study of University Students in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21721621Keywords:
Student value co-creation; Service ecosystem; Higher education; Qualitative research; Focus group discussions; Vietnam.Abstract
This study explores how undergraduate students perceive and experience value co-creation behavior within the university service ecosystem through a qualitative research approach. Data were collected through two focus group discussions involving 16 undergraduate students from one public university and one private university in Vietnam and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings reveal that students perceive value co-creation as a continuous and collaborative process that extends across the entire university experience rather than being confined to classroom learning. Participants described themselves as active contributors who co-create value through interactions with multiple stakeholders, including lecturers, peers, administrative staff, student organizations, alumni, employers, and community partners. Six interrelated themes emerged from the analysis. First, students perceive value co-creation as active participation in academic, social, and institutional activities throughout their university journey. Second, value is created through reciprocal interactions and resource integration among multiple actors within the university ecosystem. Third, collaboration, mutual trust, and shared responsibility are considered essential conditions for successful value co-creation. Fourth, students perceive that value co-creation generates diverse outcomes, including personal development, meaningful learning experiences, stronger relationships, and enhanced institutional value. Fifth, organizational culture, institutional support, and opportunities for participation shape students' willingness and ability to engage in value co-creation. Finally, differences between public and private universities indicate that institutional context influences how students experience and enact value co-creation. By adopting a service ecosystem perspective, this study extends current understanding of student value co-creation beyond classroom engagement. It highlights the central role of collaborative interactions in creating sustainable educational value within higher education.
References
Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571–588.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Brown, R. M., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The Importance of Institutional Image to Student Satisfaction and Loyalty within Higher Education. Higher Education, 58, 81–95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
Elliott, K.M. and Healy, M. A. (2001). Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01
Groth, M. (2005). Customers as good soldiers: Examining citizenship behaviors in internet service deliveries. Journal of Management, 31(1), 7–27.
Helgesen, O., & Nesset, E. (2007). What Accounts for Students’ Loyalty? Some Field Study Evidence. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 126–143.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710729926
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ledden, L., Kalafatis, S. P., & Samouel, P. (2007). The relationship between personal values and perceived value of education. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 965–974.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nejjari, R. (2026). Exploring value co-creation in private higher education institutions in Morocco: implications for financial and market performance. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(4), 1148–1159.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tomlinson, M. (2008). ‘The degree is not enough’: students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British journal of sociology of Tomlinson education, 29(1), 49–61.
Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5–23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value cocreation and service systems (re) formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2012). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026
Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279–1284.
Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Du Thi Chung, Nguyen Thi Duy Quyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.