Performance-Based Delivery and Administrative Burden: Preparing Albania for EU Cohesion Policy

Authors

  • Sonil Bilaj State Agency for Strategic Programming and Aid Coordination (SASPAC), Prime Minister’s Office, Albania
  • Valeria Valeri Montenegro and Serbia on preparations for Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21621903

Keywords:

Cohesion Policy, performance-based financing, administrative burden, National and Regional Partnership Plans, administrative capacity, Albania

Abstract

The European Commission’s proposed 2028–2034 architecture would achieve agreed milestones and targets, rather than certification of incurred expenditure, the principal trigger for payments under National and Regional Partnership Plans. The model is presented as a route to simplification and stronger performance orientation. This paper examines whether it is also likely to reduce administrative burden. Using qualitative document analysis and conceptual synthesis of recent academic and institutional literature on Cohesion Policy, the Recovery and Resilience Facility and performance budgeting, the paper develops a Performance-Delivery Burden Framework. It identifies eight interrelated burden categories: performance design, data production, coordination, verification, adaptation, financial risk, accountability and capability transition. The analysis shows that the proposed model may simplify part of the Commission–Member State reimbursement relationship while relocating administrative effort towards strategic specification, evidence production, cross-government coordination and risk management. For Albania, these requirements are likely to be particularly demanding because accession would require simultaneous development of data systems, specialized expertise and inter-institutional routines. The paper concludes that the new model represents a transformation rather than a straightforward reduction in administrative effort.

References

Bachtler, J., Kah, S., Mendez, C., van der Valk, O., & McMaster, I. (2026). Flexibility and simplification in Cohesion Policy under the 2028–2034 MFF proposals. European Parliament, Brussels. doi:https://doi.org/10.2861/2441307

Bachtler, J., Polverari, L., Domorenok, E., & Graziano, P. (2024). Administrative capacity and EU Cohesion Policy: implementation performance and effectiveness. Regional Studies, 58(4), 685-689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2276887

Begg, I., Liscai, A., Darvas, Z., Fiore, A., Krystyanczuk, M., Sekut, K., . . . van der Valk, O. (2025). Performance-based instruments: How could their design be improved? European Parliament, Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/BUDG_STU(2025)769432

Bokhorst, D., & Corti, F. (2024). Governing Europe’s Recovery and Resilience Facility: Between discipline and discretion. Government and Opposition, 59(3), 718–734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.14

European Commission. (2025). A dynamic EU budget for the priorities of the future: Multiannual Financial Framework 2028–2034. European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/publications/multiannual-financial-framework_en

European Commission. (2025). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for Union programmes and activities (COM(2025) 545 final). European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025PC0545

European Commission. (2025). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028–2034 and amend. European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/HIS/?uri=CELEX:52025PC0565

European Court of Auditors. (2021). Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: Worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014–2020 period. European Court of Auditors, Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/performance-24-2021/en/

European Court of Auditors. (2024). Double funding from the EU budget: Control systems lack essential elements to mitigate the increased risk resulting from the RRF model of financing not linked to costs. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR-2024-22

European Court of Auditors. (2025). The future of EU Cohesion Policy: Drawing lessons from the past. European Court of Auditors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2865/0171020

European Court of Auditors. (2026). Opinion 10/2026: concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities (COM(2025) 545. European Court of Auditors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/OP-2026-10

Gal, F., & van der Valk, O. (2025). New financial management tools under EU Cohesion Policy: Have they delivered on simplification? European Policies Research Centre, Delft. Retrieved from https://eprc-strath.org/publication/new-financial-management-tools-under-eu-cohesion-policy-have-they-delivered-on-simplification/

Hassan, E., Cioancă, A., Schröttke, T., Louguet, A., Landes, F., Naldini, A., . . . Cincera, M. (2025). Assessment of the administrative costs and burden of CPR funds 2021–2027: Final report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2776/1596905

Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2024). The quality of government and administrative performance: Explaining Cohesion Policy compliance, absorption and achievements across EU regions. Regional Studies, 58(4), 690–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2083593

OECD. (2025). Government at a Glance 2025. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en

OECD. (2025). Strengthening performance reporting practices. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/bcea6d2d-en

Rubio, E., & Alcidi, C. (2026). Navigating the European Commission’s MFF proposal for 2028–2034: Mapping risks and opportunities for Cohesion Policy and regional development. European Parliament, Brussels. doi:https://doi.org/10.2861/4555208

Zeitlin, J., Bokhorst, D., & Eihmanis, E. (2025). Governing the European Union’s Recovery and Resilience Facility: National ownership and performance-based financing in theory and practice. Regulation & Governance, 19(3), 864–884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12619

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27