ESG Practices and Customer-Based Performance: Insights from the Dairy Industry in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18975202Keywords:
ESG Practices, dairy market, sustainability marketing in VietnamAbstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices have become an increasingly important component of corporate responsibility in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, particularly in the dairy industry where sustainability, food safety, and environmental responsibility are critical concerns. This qualitative study explores how ESG practices are perceived and communicated in the Vietnamese dairy sector and how they relate to customer-based performance. Data were collected through ten in-depth interviews with marketing experts working in the dairy industry, including professionals responsible for brand management, sustainability communication, and marketing strategy. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal three key themes. First, marketing experts increasingly view ESG as a strategic orientation rather than merely a regulatory or compliance requirement. Second, among the three ESG dimensions, environmental and social practices are perceived as the most visible and actionable in the dairy sector, particularly in relation to sustainable farming, environmental protection, product safety, and community engagement. Governance practices, although essential for corporate accountability, are viewed as less visible to consumers and therefore less influential in shaping customer perceptions. Third, the findings suggest that ESG initiatives do not automatically translate into improved customer-based performance. Instead, sustainability marketing emerges as an important mechanism through which ESG initiatives are communicated and interpreted by consumers. Transparent and credible sustainability communication can strengthen brand credibility, customer trust, and positive word-of-mouth, whereas overly promotional claims may trigger scepticism and concerns about greenwashing. The study also indicates that sustainability initiatives complement, rather than replace, core product attributes such as quality, safety, and price in shaping consumer purchasing decisions in the dairy market.
References
Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2012). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chabowski, B., Mena, J., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Official Publication of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0212-7
Choi, B., & Ng, A. (2011). Environmental and social responsibility in the consumer decision process: A case study of green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximising business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring business excellence, 2(3), 18–22.
Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1–16). Earthscan.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Park, B. I. (2015). Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy. International Marketing Review, 32(5), 463–491.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Parry, K. (2018). Sustainability: A business imperative for the future. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(2), 11–17.
Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: The third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), 129–146.
Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty: exploring the role of identification, satisfaction and type of company. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(1), 15–25.
Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2022). ESG management and corporate performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1906359
PwC. (2024). Voice of the consumer survey 2024: Asia Pacific – Respond, rethink, reimagine: Strengthening consumer trust in Vietnam. PricewaterhouseCoopers. https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/2024/voice-of-consumer-2024.pdf
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2021). Sustainable marketing: Market-driving, not market-driven. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720987616
Svensson, G., & Wagner, B. (2015). Implementing and managing economic, social and environmental efforts of business sustainability. Management of Environmental Quality, 26(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2013-0099
Winterich, K.P., Reczek, R.W. & Makov, T. (2024). How lack of knowledge on emissions and psychological biases deter consumers from taking effective action to mitigate climate change. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52, 1475–1494 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00981-z
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Du Thi Chung

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.