Integrating AI-Supported IELTS Writing Tasks into an ELT Writing Course for Sustainable Teacher Education: A Qualitative Study of Pre-Service English Teachers’ Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18932410Keywords:
AI-supported writing; IELTS writing; pre-service English teachers; sustainable teacher education; assessment literacyAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into academic writing instruction has generated growing pedagogical and ethical debate, particularly in teacher education and high-stakes assessment contexts such as IELTS writing. Although AI-supported writing tools offer opportunities for feedback, revision, and language development, qualitative evidence on how pre-service English teachers experience these tools within structured ELT writing courses remains limited. This qualitative case study examines pre-service English teachers’ experiences with AI-supported IELTS Writing Task 1 and Task 2 activities integrated into a compulsory Academic Writing course at a foundation university in İstanbul, Türkiye. The participants consisted of 49 pre-service English teachers. Data were collected through multiple qualitative sources, including initial and revised IELTS writing drafts, structured reflective journals, and semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected participants. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that AI primarily functioned as a pedagogical scaffold supporting idea generation, revision, and linguistic awareness rather than replacing student authorship. Participants reported increased assessment literacy through closer engagement with IELTS criteria, heightened awareness of ethical use of AI, and growing authorial responsibility. Additionally, AI-supported writing practices contributed to learner autonomy, reflective practice, and the emergence of professional identities. The study suggests that pedagogically guided AI integration in IELTS writing can support sustainable ELT teacher education, aligning with SDG-4 by fostering digital competence and lifelong learning skills.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Emerging technologies: AI for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.125/llt.26.2.1
Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005). Dimensions of difference: A comparison of university writing and IELTS writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090035
UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT in education: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11434-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manolya Sağlam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.